What are the chances of all three being wrong in such ways as to produce the same wrong answer? Oklo interactions have also been used to validate a young earth view after analysis of the restraints imposed on the alpha-decay half-lives. By reliable I mean, by anyone who has not been shown to purposefully lie about their experiment in order to promote Jesus. But in the end, they are reduced to saying that "radiometric dating must be wrong, because we know it happened this way. There is no reason to believe the theory is faulty, or to believe that thousands of different chemists could be so consistently wrong in the face of every conceivable test. Glenn Morton is an old-Earth creationist, not an "evolutionist".
The other group believes the ark is 17 miles south of Mt.
Assumptions of Radioactive Dating
Recombining English letters will never produce Chinese books. Theory of Radiometric Dating. So an atom of potassium K40atomic number 19 can absorb an electron to become an atom of argon Ar40atomic number Now, why is all this relevant to the creation-vs. I have many video and audio tapes on the subject of creation, evolution, proofs that the earth is not "Billions of years old," the geologic column, carbon dating, and dinosaurs. Over Flood legends from all parts of the world have been found.